<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could control of dogs echo gun laws?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petdogology.com/petdogblog/could-control-of-dogs-echo-gun-laws-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petdogology.com/petdogblog/could-control-of-dogs-echo-gun-laws-2/</link>
	<description>www.PetDogOlogy.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Memphis Belle</title>
		<link>http://petdogology.com/petdogblog/could-control-of-dogs-echo-gun-laws-2/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Memphis Belle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petdogology.com/petdogblog/could-control-of-dogs-echo-gun-laws-2/#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Anyone who can pen an article titled &#34;There are no bad dogs, only bad owners&#34;, has missed one rather glaring point, GENETICS!

If the dog is royally fvcked up genetically, with an unstable temperament, it's behavior will be unpredictable &amp; possibly dangerous. Yes, environmental factors can stimulate an already existing tendency to a behavioral weakness, but it was always there in the dog.

You cannot change what nature gave the dog, only work with some dogs to control their behavior &amp; euthanise others which would pose a real risk to the safety of their family. Owners should treat a dog like a dog, don't ignore, tolerate or excuse any aggressive behavior &amp; definitely don't look at a dog through rose coloured glasses &amp; think love, understanding &amp; training will somehow magically *cure* an unsound temperament.

I agree with Indestructible's point that you cannot legislate common sense into a vacuous brain &amp; people will still purchase cheap unstable dogs, fail to supervise children &amp; allow their dog's behaivor to be a threat to others by not controlling it with training.

None of the five points would be an issue if it was a mentally sound, obedience trained dog, owned by a responsible, strong minded fair pack leader.

I can see a case for holding whoever was the responsible adult in charge of the dog criminally negligent is death or serious bodily injury resulted from a dog attack incident. If the punished bore more of a correlation to the serious nature of the crime, then perhaps more owners would behave responsibility......even not support back yard breeders &amp; pet shops with their cash &amp; save for a well bred, mentally sound dog {well, I can dream}.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who can pen an article titled &quot;There are no bad dogs, only bad owners&quot;, has missed one rather glaring point, GENETICS!</p>
<p>If the dog is royally fvcked up genetically, with an unstable temperament, it&#8217;s behavior will be unpredictable &amp; possibly dangerous. Yes, environmental factors can stimulate an already existing tendency to a behavioral weakness, but it was always there in the dog.</p>
<p>You cannot change what nature gave the dog, only work with some dogs to control their behavior &amp; euthanise others which would pose a real risk to the safety of their family. Owners should treat a dog like a dog, don&#8217;t ignore, tolerate or excuse any aggressive behavior &amp; definitely don&#8217;t look at a dog through rose coloured glasses &amp; think love, understanding &amp; training will somehow magically *cure* an unsound temperament.</p>
<p>I agree with Indestructible&#8217;s point that you cannot legislate common sense into a vacuous brain &amp; people will still purchase cheap unstable dogs, fail to supervise children &amp; allow their dog&#8217;s behaivor to be a threat to others by not controlling it with training.</p>
<p>None of the five points would be an issue if it was a mentally sound, obedience trained dog, owned by a responsible, strong minded fair pack leader.</p>
<p>I can see a case for holding whoever was the responsible adult in charge of the dog criminally negligent is death or serious bodily injury resulted from a dog attack incident. If the punished bore more of a correlation to the serious nature of the crime, then perhaps more owners would behave responsibility&#8230;&#8230;even not support back yard breeders &amp; pet shops with their cash &amp; save for a well bred, mentally sound dog {well, I can dream}.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
